I could "marshal a defence" right now if you'd like, but it would be pointless. You'd brush it off as being "unverifiable" at best, or just claim I was making it all up at worst. It takes a scientist months to put together proper presentable data, as you should know. And the reason it would take that long is because I have a demanding job. This is the internet, after all ... producing data for you isn't something I can do full-time. I said "But anyway - great, fine. I accept your clarification - I overrule any doubts I have about your motives - I'm happy to move on." Why do you think I don't support moving on now, despite me explicitly saying I'm happy to do so?[/quote] Because you're making a specific point of continuing to place blame on me for your not moving on in the first place. Hence this part of the discussion still existing long past the point of it being relevant and/or useful, to the point of you derailing the discussion. I'm glad to hear you don't have a job which keeps you away from collecting Red Dwarf opinions to a scientifically approved level of presentation. If only we were all that lucky. Because you're asking me to trust you and believe in your evidence. Which means you should probably not do that if you aren't willing to return the favour.