Movie sequels is what I'm talking about. In general I'm not a huge fan of them as too many just seem to want to cash in on the original. Some are indeed very good though and a few, a very few, are even better than the original. This will be sort of a 2 or maybe even 3 part question for everyone. 1. What's the Worst sequel to the original you've ever seen? My choice for this dubious honor is Crank 2. I like the original quite a lot and re-watch it on a semi-regular basis ........ couple of times a year. I distinctly remember thinking as I watched it end on my first viewing " This is one movie that WON'T get a sequel". Imagine my surprise when not a month later I see that they are making Crank 2. Of course I snatched it up the second the DVD came on sale, watched it once ,in horror I might add, and promptly put it in my unused box. I did give it another try later on but could not even finish it. I deleted the rip from my HD and tossed the DVD disgusted. Unbelievable even for an action movie, almost a scene by scene recreation of the original shot as a parody. Very disappointed. 2. What's the BEST sequel you've seen? My vote here goes to Now You See Me 2. Loved the first one! Was a little nervous about the second because so many sequels fall short. But I think 2 not only captured the essence of the 1st but improved on it. Kept me guessing and glued to my seat. A wonderful movie and an outstanding sequel imho. 3. What movie WITHOUT a sequel would you like to see a second installment of? I'm going with The Watchmen on this. While I thought the original could have used a little editing I found it quite entertaining and a great watch. Those are my picks for sequels pro and con and hopeful, what's yours?